Good Practices

The policies reflected in this database come from the submissions of ESCAP members and associate members through different channels, including through secretariat surveys, supplemented by research by ESCAP staff. Good practices were selected by ESCAP and represent a selection of good practices in implementing MIPAA in Asia and the Pacific. ESCAP bears no responsibility for the availability or functioning of external URLs.

The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.

Total: 119 good practice(s).

Implementing/responsible entity:
Civil society (Alzheimer’s Association of Turkey) and National and local governments
Country:
Türkiye
Categories:
Enabling and supportive environments (Support to caregivers).
Type of document:
Service
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of the Republic of Korea, Ministry of Health and Welfare
Country:
Republic of Korea
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Employment and re-employment).
Type of document:
Programme
Implementing/responsible entity:
Civil society
Country:
Tajikistan
Categories:
Older persons and development (Older persons’ associations).
Type of document:
Case study
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments and the Social Security Organisation (SSO)
Country:
Philippines
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect).
Type of document:
Law or act
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government of Australia, Attorney-General’s Department
Country:
Australia
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect).
Type of document:
Action plan
Implementing/responsible entity:
Human Rights Commission Australia
Country:
Australia
Categories:
Discrimination, neglect, abuse (Abuse and neglect).
Type of document:
Service
Implementing/responsible entity:
Government, Ministry of Health and Welfare
Country:
Republic of Korea
Categories:
Work, the labour force, poverty and social protection (Social protection/income security).
Type of document:
Programme
Implementing/responsible entity:
National and local governments
Country:
Japan
Categories:
Emergency situations (Natural disasters).
Type of document:
Action plan
Implementing/responsible entity:
Australian Government
Country:
Australia
Categories:
Older persons and development (Digital inclusion).
Type of document:
Service
Implementing/responsible entity:
New Zealand Government, Office for Seniors
Country:
New Zealand
Categories:
Older persons and development (Comprehensive policy frameworks).
Type of document:
Action plan